Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Tupac and a Push for Palestinian Freedom



Oakland, California and Lod, Israel two cities separated by 7,405 miles that share a surprising connection.  Tupac Shakur a rapper from Oakland, California is considered one of the most influential rappers of all time. During the early 1990’s his music could be heard on radio stations all across America. He rapped about the struggles of living in an inner city, the effects of drugs on poor neighborhoods, and a system of racism that divided that kept African Americans from becoming successful. A young Tamer Nafar in the small city of Lod, Israel, heard this message and was inspired to rap. Lod is similar to Oakland in many ways, about 15 minutes from Tel Aviv, it is a poor town filled mainly with people of Palestinians, outsiders in their own country. Tamer learned English by memorizing Tupac’s songs and translating them to English.
                Tamer decided that his town needed a similar voice and began rapping in 1998 recording an EP “Stop Selling Drugs.” He joined up with his younger brother Suhell Nafer and childhood friend Mahmoud Jreri and the group DAM was born. DAM, meaning “blood” in Hebrew, began preforming in clubs around Tel Aviv. They originally rapped in Hebrew and wrote songs about violence and drugs in the city they grew up in.
                Their music took a sudden shift in 2000 during the Second Intifada. DAM saw the violence around them and decided to lend their voice to the Palestinian resistance. They wrote their first political song over a beat from their hero Tupac Shakur. They released the song “Innocent Criminals” a song about the struggles of Palestinians living in Israel and the hypocrisy of the Israeli government. The song became a huge hit with Palestinians and gained a large amount of attention all over Israel.

                DAM went on to release many hits including “Who is the Terrorist?” “Born Here” and “Dedication.” They are credited with the rise of Palestinian Hip-Hop and lending a powerful, young voice to the struggle of young Palestinians. In a way they became the Tupac of the Arab world. Born into an oppressive system that kept them confined to a poor city, filled with violence and drugs using rap as a method of expression and protest to raise awareness about a struggle that many people would not think about if not for the music that defines it.

They have a fire soundcloud for anyone interested: https://soundcloud.com/damrap

References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAM_(band)

-Cameron Cook

Friday, April 7, 2017

American Change of Heart?


          Over the past two weeks, the situation in Syria took an unforeseen turn when Syrian President, Bashar-al-Assad, launched chemical weapons strikes against his own people in the rebel controlled Idlib Province. As of right now, the death toll exceeds 70 and consists mostly of elderly citizens and children. This war crime has sparked outrage across the globe, and it has been debated why the Syrian leader would make such a move when his forces are closing in on the rebel strongholds. Even the U.S. had turned their attention from the situation since Trump took office. Why execute such a barbaric and controversial strategy? Assad is probably feeling the ramifications of his actions now that the U.S. has reinforced their commitment to removing him from office.
          Last Friday, President Trump ordered cruise missile strikes against a Syrian airbase. The strikes were mostly successful as all but one hit their target. One missile failed in flight. This is also an interesting move by the U.S. President. Ever since taking office, he has diverted attention from Syria, in an effort to build upon relations with the Russians, who have supported Assad’s regime from the beginning. Several countries have condemned the U.S. attack as an assault on the sovereignty of a nation, including Russia, China, and Iran. But several more countries, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Australia, support the president’s actions, stating that the chemical attacks are a war crime that should be dealt with.
          Even U.S. citizens have shown overall support for the strikes. Although some officials, including Senator Tim Kaine, question the legality of Trump’s actions saying, “He should not have done this without coming to congress.” Many people think that this marks the beginning of official U.S. involvement in the Syrian Rebellion and not just by means of local proxies. Only time will tell.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/04/syria-chemical-attack-idlib-province http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/07/world/syria-us-strike-world-reaction/ http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s-launches-missiles-syrian-base-after-chemical-weapons-attack-n743636 http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tim-kaine-trump-has-no-congressional-authorization-for-syria-strike/article/2619644

Air Strikes



Recent air strikes


Phot cred: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/06/us-military-has-launched-more-50-than-missiles-aimed-at-syria-nbc-news.html

          Since 2011 Syria has been launched into the Civil War led by many level Rebel groups including such as Free Syrian Army, ISIS, Al-Qaeda and pro authoritarian Assad troops. Originally United States stayed relatively neutral in Syria, because Assad has strong alliances with Russia. In 2014 United States started launching attacks against ISIS in the Iraq and Syrian region and carefully avoided Assad forces [1]. However, a land mark event has occurred that may mark a change in the United States’ level of involvement in Syria. Thursday evening presidents Trump launched 59 tomahawk missiles into Syria onto an Assad controlled air field [2].



                 Photo cred: http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/donald-trump-syria-military/
          

             According to president Trump the US airstrike is in response to Syria's use of chemical weapons in the rebel-held town of Idlib where “at least a hundred people have been killed and 400 injured” [3] according to some accounts. These actions have garnered a lot of attention on social media because news accounts have posted videos of civilians dying after inhaling toxic fumes. In a press conference shortly after launching the air strikes Donald Trump said “Using a deadly nerve agent, Assad choked out the lives of helpless men, women and children. It was a slow and brutal death for so many."[2]

The United States informed many foreign and allied states ahead of their airstrikes; including Russia. Russia claims that Assad did not launch chemical attacks, rather Assad forces launched attacks on rebel factories and strongholds that were hoarding chemical weapons. [4]
Politically this is bad for Assad and his forces; now they must be cautious when conducting further military action, because now the United States has set a precedent now that it may police the region.
                This may be a political victory for Trump because it minimizes recent allegations that claim he has dangerous ties with Russia, also this event may showcase him in a morally good light. However, if Assad is proven not to have been involved in leading chemical strikes then it can lead to increased tensions between Russia and the United States.
A U.S. defense official called the U.S. strike a "one-off" [2].  Liberal media outlets have expressed concerns that this may be the early signs of the United States posturing for an all-out military effort in the region while conservative news outlets seem to be celebrating the airstrikes as an American moral victory. The truth of the matter is that no one knows for sure how we will look back on this event in the future. 
                                                                                                                         -Ibrahim Khan